Overview
A Bloemfontein Firm Founded in 1911 Enjoys a 60% Recovery Ratio
One of Bloemfontein’s oldest law firms, founded in 1911, with 42 employees across the Free State practice.
The Challenge
A 42-employee practice needed consistent disbursement recovery, and manual capture made it difficult to sustain recovery performance.
The Solution
nQ ZebraWorks tracking and billing every disbursement automatically since 2023.
The Result
More than R110,000 a month in average recovery sustained from FY2023 through FY2026 alongside a 60% recovery ratio, with a net fee increase reported on top.
Read the Full Case Study
The complete write-up, including the figures behind these results.
Curious What Your Firm Is Leaving Behind?
Run the ROI calculator to size your own recovery gap, or talk to a Khwezi specialist about your practice.
Bloemfontein Law Firm Cost Recovery in a 115-Year-Old Practice
Bloemfontein law firm cost recovery became a management question for this Free State practice long before it changed any software. Founded in 1911 and now employing 42 people, the firm was absorbing the cost of printing, copying, scanning and courier work on matters it was entitled to bill for but could not consistently evidence. Manual capture was the weak link. Fee earners were busy, notes were written after the fact, and anything not recorded on the day was effectively written off.
Why disbursement leakage hits established firms hardest
Long-standing practices tend to run more matter types, more branches and more legacy habits than younger firms. Conveyancing, litigation and estates work all generate recoverable output, but each does so in a different rhythm, and the volume is spread across dozens of hands. The larger the firm, the less realistic it becomes to expect every fee earner to remember which matter a 60-page bundle belonged to. Leakage in that environment is rarely one big failure. It is hundreds of small omissions a week that never reach a bill.
There is a second cost that firms underestimate. When recovery data is incomplete, partners lose the ability to see which matters are genuinely profitable. Disbursements are not only a revenue line, they are a measurement of how much unbilled effort a matter is consuming. A practice that cannot measure that is guessing when it prices work.
What changed when capture moved off the fee earner
The firm introduced nQ ZebraWorks in 2023 to track and bill every disbursement automatically. The principle is simple: the point of capture moves from a person to the device. Output is allocated to a matter as it happens rather than reconstructed later, which removes the two failure points that cause most leakage, namely forgetting and estimating.
Sustained Bloemfontein law firm cost recovery depends on that automation being invisible. If a system adds steps at the copier, fee earners route around it. If allocation happens in the background and defaults sensibly, compliance stops being a behavioural problem and becomes an administrative one.
The result: a 60% recovery ratio and more than R110,000 a month
From FY2023 through FY2026 the practice sustained an average recovery of more than R110,000 a month, alongside a 60% recovery ratio, with a net fee increase reported on top of the recovered disbursements. The word that matters in that sentence is sustained. Most firms can produce a good recovery month after a system goes in. Holding the same ratio across four financial years is what separates a genuine process change from a short-lived push.
The net fee increase is worth isolating. Better disbursement data gave the firm a clearer view of what each matter actually consumed, which fed back into how work was scoped and billed. Cost recovery paid twice: once in recovered outlay, and again in better-informed fees.
What a firm of this size should measure
Practices weighing up Bloemfontein law firm cost recovery against their own numbers should track the recovery ratio month on month rather than in isolation, monitor the split between recovered and absorbed output by matter type, watch how much output carries no matter allocation at all, and compare recovery per fee earner across branches to expose habit rather than workload. The unallocated figure is usually the most revealing, because it is the pool the firm is silently funding.
Compare this with other South African practices
Firm size changes the shape of the problem but not its nature. A litigation-led practice in the same city reached similar conclusions in our Bloemfontein litigation cost recovery case study, while a multi-branch operation faced a harder allocation challenge in the Gauteng multi-branch case study. For the underlying platform, see our overview of nQ ZebraWorks and how it compares with PaperCut for legal practices specifically.
The underlying platform is built by Zebraworks, and Khwezi Holdings deploys and supports nQ ZebraWorks for law firms across South Africa and the region.