Overview
A Benoni Practice Recovers 15x More in Disbursements
An eight-person law firm in Benoni running nQ ZebraWorks on its Xerox device.
The Challenge
Disbursements were captured manually and recovery billing recorded only R4,000 a month. The firm was going through five boxes of paper a month at R450 a box, with paper and device rental costing R6,625 a month.
The Solution
nQ ZebraWorks deployed on the firm’s Xerox device, tracking and billing every disbursement automatically across printing, copying, telephone and scan.
The Result
Disbursement recovery increased roughly 15x, from R4,000 to R35,000 a month in FY2020, R44,900 in FY2021 and R61,000 in FY2022, with the recovery ratio holding at 60% and a net fee increase on top.
Read the Full Case Study
The complete write-up, including the figures behind these results.
Curious What Your Firm Is Leaving Behind?
Run the ROI calculator to size your own recovery gap, or talk to a Khwezi specialist about your practice.
Law Firm Disbursement Recovery at an Eight-Person Benoni Practice
Law firm disbursement recovery is usually written about as a big-firm problem, yet this eight-person practice in Benoni proves the opposite. Before nQ ZebraWorks was installed on the firm’s Xerox device, the practice was recovering R4 000 a month against a paper and device bill of R6 625 a month. Within three financial years monthly recovery had climbed to R61 000 — roughly fifteen times the original figure — and the firm was holding a steady 60% recovery ratio on everything it disbursed on behalf of clients.

The Real Cost of Capturing Disbursements by Hand
The practice was consuming five boxes of paper a month at R450 a box, and law firm disbursement recovery depended entirely on somebody remembering to write down every page, call and scan that should have been charged to a matter. In a firm of eight people, where fee earners double as administrators, a memory-based system fails quietly. Nothing looks broken. There is no error report, no rejected invoice and no unhappy client. The disbursement simply never reaches the file, and the practice absorbs it as overhead. At R4 000 recovered against R6 625 spent, the firm was underwater on its own print and communications infrastructure every single month.
What Changed When nQ ZebraWorks Went Live
For law firm disbursement recovery to be reliable, capture has to happen where the work does, so nQ ZebraWorks was deployed directly on the firm’s Xerox device rather than bolted on as a separate reporting layer. Printing, copying, telephone and scanning were all captured at the point of use and posted automatically against the correct matter. Fee earners were prompted for a matter reference at the device itself, which removed the reconstruction step entirely, so there was no longer a stack of notes to work through at month end. Because capture happened before the work left the machine, the firm stopped debating whether a charge was recoverable and simply billed it.
Three Financial Years of Numbers
Recovery moved from R4 000 a month to R35 000 in FY2020, R44 900 in FY2021 and R61 000 in FY2022. That is not a one-off spike caused by a single large matter; it is a compounding trend driven by consistent capture across every fee earner. The 60% ratio held throughout, and the practice recorded a net fee increase on top of the recovered disbursements, because the hours that had gone into chasing and reconstructing charges went back into billable work.
Why 60% Is a Healthy Ratio at This Size
A 60% law firm disbursement recovery ratio means six rands in every ten spent on print, copy, telephone and scan is charged back to the matter that caused it. In a small practice the remaining 40% is genuinely internal: precedent libraries, marketing, staff correspondence and administrative filing. Pushing much higher than this in an eight-person firm usually means charging clients for work that was never theirs, which invites fee queries and taxation problems. Sixty per cent, sustained across three years, is the signature of an honest and well-configured system. The larger 20-user Gauteng practice settled at 65% for much the same reason, while the smaller five-user Rosebank firm reached 80% because almost all of its output was client-facing.
What Smaller Practices Should Take From This
The lesson is that law firm disbursement recovery scales down. There is no minimum headcount at which automated recovery becomes worthwhile, because the paper, the device rental and the telephone line are already being paid for; the only open question is who pays for them. Firms weighing their options can review our nQ ZebraWorks overview and the feature-by-feature nQ ZebraWorks versus PaperCut comparison, which explains why generic print-management tools rarely produce defensible recovery figures.
Law Firm Disbursement Recovery at a Glance
Reduced to essentials, law firm disbursement recovery at this practice went from R4 000 to R61 000 a month over three financial years against a R6 625 monthly paper and device bill, holding a 60% ratio throughout. The device did not change and neither did the client base.
nQ ZebraWorks is built by Zebraworks, the vendor behind the invoices-to-cash platform used by law firms internationally, and Khwezi Holdings is its South African implementation partner.
