Skip links

nQ Zebraworks 15 User Law Firm Case Study – Dunkeld West

Overview

A Dunkeld West Practice Sustains a 95% Recovery Ratio

A 15-person law firm based in Dunkeld West, Johannesburg, using nQ ZebraWorks to track and bill every disbursement automatically.

15
Employees
95%
Recovery Ratio
R300K
Monthly Recovery, FY2025
01

The Challenge

Manual disbursement capture across a small fee-earner base, with no consistent way to track recovery performance year on year.

02

The Solution

nQ ZebraWorks tracking and billing every disbursement automatically — printing, copying, telephone and scan — across the practice.

03

The Result

The recovery ratio has held at 95%, with average monthly disbursement recovery growing from R225,000 in FY2022 to R300,000 in FY2025. The firm also reported a net fee increase over and above these recoveries.

Read the Full Case Study

The complete write-up, including the figures behind these results.

Download PDF

Curious What Your Firm Is Leaving Behind?

Run the ROI calculator to size your own recovery gap, or talk to a Khwezi specialist about your practice.


Dunkeld West Law Firm Cost Recovery: Holding a 95% Ratio for Four Years

Dunkeld West law firm cost recovery in this Johannesburg practice is notable less for a dramatic turnaround than for its consistency. Fifteen people, one office, and a recovery ratio that has held at 95% while average monthly recovery grew from R225,000 in FY2022 to R300,000 in FY2025. Most firms can manage a strong quarter. Very few hold the same ratio across four financial years while volumes change underneath them.

Dunkeld West law firm cost recovery results for a 15-person Johannesburg practice

Why a small fee-earner base makes recovery harder, not easier

With fifteen people there is nowhere to hide an administrative gap, but there is also no spare capacity to absorb one. Every fee earner is billing, so every minute spent reconstructing which matter a print run belonged to is a minute not billed. Manual capture in a practice this size does not fail loudly. It fails quietly, in the last hour of the day, when the day’s output is written off rather than allocated.

The firm’s real problem before automation was not the amount recovered but the absence of a reliable way to track recovery performance year on year. Without that baseline there is no way to tell whether a lower month reflects lower activity or worse capture, and the two require completely different responses.

What automatic capture changed

nQ ZebraWorks now tracks and bills every disbursement automatically across printing, copying, telephone and scan. The significant word is every. Sustained Dunkeld West law firm cost recovery comes from closing all four channels rather than the one that is easiest to measure, because partial capture produces a number that is precise and still wrong.

Once allocation happens at the device, the reporting side becomes possible almost as a by-product. The firm can compare this month with the same month last year and know the comparison means something, because the capture method has not changed between them.

A 95% ratio and R300,000 a month

The recovery ratio has held at 95%, with average monthly recovery moving from R225,000 in FY2022 to R300,000 in FY2025, alongside a reported net fee increase over and above the recovered disbursements. A 95% ratio is close to the practical ceiling. The remaining gap is largely made up of output that genuinely should not be billed, such as internal administration and speculative work.

What makes the trajectory more interesting than the ratio is that growth came from rising volume being captured properly rather than from a one-off correction. The system scaled with the practice instead of degrading as it got busier, which is the point at which most manual processes break.

What to take from this if you run a similar practice

Firms benchmarking their own Dunkeld West law firm cost recovery equivalent should look at the ratio rather than the rand figure first, since the rand figure moves with activity while the ratio measures the process. Then check whether telephone and scan are included, whether the ratio holds in busy months as well as quiet ones, and whether anyone can explain a month-on-month change without guessing.

Compare with other South African firms

A boutique in the Eastern Cape saw a far larger multiple from a much lower base in our Gqeberha law firm disbursement recovery case study, and a larger Sandton practice is covered in the Sandton disbursement recovery case study. For the underlying platform, see nQ ZebraWorks and how it compares with PaperCut for law firms.

nQ ZebraWorks comes from Zebraworks, whose invoices-to-cash software sits behind the recovery figures above. Khwezi Holdings handles implementation and support locally.

This website uses cookies to improve your web experience.
Home
Search