Overview
One of South Africa’s Oldest Law Firms Recovers 12x More in Disbursements
A 160-employee practice and one of South Africa’s oldest law firms, evenly split between litigation, commercial and conveyancing work.
The Challenge
Manual, inconsistent disbursement capture across 160 fee earners. A competitive cost recovery tool left recoveries stuck below R40,000 a month, and paper and device rental costs across the firm’s HP fleet were high.
The Solution
nQ ZebraWorks embedded across the firm’s HP devices, tracking and billing every disbursement automatically.
The Result
Disbursement recovery increased roughly 12x, from R40,000 to R320,000 a month in FY2024 and R480,000 in FY2025, with the recovery ratio holding at 57% and a net fee increase on top.
Read the Full Case Study
The complete write-up, including the figures behind these results.
Curious What Your Firm Is Leaving Behind?
Run the ROI calculator to size your own recovery gap, or talk to a Khwezi specialist about your practice.
Enterprise Law Firm Cost Recovery Across 160 Fee Earners
Enterprise law firm cost recovery at this practice, one of South Africa’s oldest, meant solving the problem across 160 employees split fairly evenly between litigation, commercial and conveyancing work. A competitive cost recovery tool had left recoveries stuck below R40,000 a month. Recovery now runs at R480,000 a month at a 57% ratio.
Why scale makes manual capture mathematically impossible
At 160 fee earners, small failure rates become large numbers. If each person produces recoverable output several times a day and even a modest share goes unallocated, the monthly total is significant before anyone has done anything wrong. There is no version of manual capture that survives this scale, because the error rate does not need to be high to matter.
The firm also carried high paper and device rental costs across an HP fleet. Those costs arrive monthly regardless of allocation, so the gap between overhead incurred and disbursements recovered was being funded directly out of fee income across three practice areas at once.
An even split across three practice areas
Litigation, commercial and conveyancing in roughly equal measure is the hardest possible mix to manage manually, because each produces recoverable output on a different rhythm. Any single manual convention will suit one and fail the other two. Consistent enterprise law firm cost recovery at this scale depends on capture being indifferent to practice area: allocation happens at the device, and the reporting layer separates the disciplines afterwards.
Twelvefold growth, and why 57% is the honest figure
nQ ZebraWorks was embedded across the firm’s HP devices, tracking and billing every disbursement automatically. Recovery rose roughly 12x, from R40,000 to R320,000 a month in FY2024 and R480,000 in FY2025, with the ratio holding at 57% and a net fee increase reported on top.
A 57% ratio is lower than several smaller firms in our case study set, and that is worth addressing rather than glossing over. In a 160-person firm a substantial share of output is genuinely internal: file copies, internal circulation, precedent libraries and administrative records that were never recoverable from any client. The ratio reflects the composition of the work, not a shortfall in capture. The meaningful measure is that the firm now knows what that share is.
The absolute figures make the point differently. Moving from R40,000 to R480,000 a month is R5.3 million a year in recovered disbursements that was previously absorbed as overhead, before the reported net fee increase is considered.
What large firms should measure
Report the recovery ratio by practice area and by floor or department, since firm-wide figures at this size hide everything useful. Track unallocated output as an absolute number rather than a percentage, because a small percentage of a large volume is still a large amount of money. Reconcile recovered disbursements against paper and device rental costs so the overhead position is explicit, and confirm capture is embedded in the device fleet rather than running alongside it.
Related South African case studies
A three-office practice is covered in our Gauteng multi-branch case study, and a 90-user firm that replaced a reporting-only product appears in the KwaZulu-Natal case study. For the platform behind these results, see nQ ZebraWorks and how it compares with PaperCut for large practices.
nQ ZebraWorks comes from Zebraworks, whose invoices-to-cash software sits behind the recovery figures above. Khwezi Holdings handles implementation and support locally.