Skip links

nQ Zebraworks 90 User Law Firm Case Study – KwaZulu-Natal

Overview

A 30-Year-Old KwaZulu-Natal Firm Recovers 5x More in Disbursements

A KwaZulu-Natal practice established in May 1996, spanning dispute resolution, litigation, conveyancing and family law.

1996
Established
<10% → 80%+
Recovery Ratio
R263K
Monthly Recovery, FY2026
01

The Challenge

A competitor product required manual capture of disbursements from reports. Recovery billing was stuck at R49,000 a month and the recovery ratio sat below 10%.

02

The Solution

nQ ZebraWorks tracking and billing every disbursement automatically, lifting the recovery ratio above 80%.

03

The Result

Average monthly disbursement recovery rose roughly 5x, from R49,000 to R220,000 in FY2025 and R263,000 in FY2026, with a net fee increase reported over and above these recoveries.

Read the Full Case Study

The complete write-up, including the figures behind these results.

Download PDF

Curious What Your Firm Is Leaving Behind?

Run the ROI calculator to size your own recovery gap, or talk to a Khwezi specialist about your practice.


KwaZulu-Natal Law Firm Cost Recovery: From Below 10% to Over 80%

KwaZulu-Natal law firm cost recovery at this 90-user practice moved from a recovery ratio below 10% to above 80%. The firm was established in May 1996 and spans dispute resolution, litigation, conveyancing and family law. Monthly recovery rose roughly fivefold, from R49,000 to R220,000 in FY2025 and R263,000 in FY2026.

KwaZulu-Natal law firm cost recovery results for a 90-user multi-disciplinary practice

A recovery ratio below 10% is a system problem, not a discipline problem

The firm was already running a competitor product before the change, and that detail explains the starting figure. The previous system produced reports, and someone then had to read those reports and capture disbursements manually into the billing process. Every step of that chain worked exactly as designed, and the outcome was still a recovery ratio in single digits.

This is the most common and most expensive misconception in legal cost recovery. Reporting is not recovery. A system that tells you what was printed has done nothing for the balance sheet until that output has been attributed to a matter and pushed into a bill without a human transcription step in between. At 90 users, expecting anyone to bridge that gap by hand is not a realistic plan.

What changed with automatic capture

nQ ZebraWorks now tracks and bills every disbursement automatically, and the recovery ratio moved above 80%. Nothing about the firm’s underlying activity changed. Substantial KwaZulu-Natal law firm cost recovery was available the entire time, sitting in the gap between a report and an invoice.

The four practice areas make the result more notable. Dispute resolution and litigation produce output in unpredictable bursts, conveyancing produces it in predictable batches, and family law produces it under emotional pressure. A single manual process cannot serve all four. An automated one does not need to distinguish between them.

Fivefold growth, and still rising

Average monthly recovery rose from R49,000 to R220,000 in FY2025 and R263,000 in FY2026, with a net fee increase reported over and above the recoveries. The continued growth into FY2026 matters more than the initial multiple. The first jump captured what the old process was losing; the second year of growth reflects the firm extending the same discipline further into its work.

An 80%-plus ratio in a multi-disciplinary practice of this size is a strong outcome. The remaining share is largely genuine internal and speculative output, which is a very different position from not knowing where the other 90% went.

What to check if you are running a reporting-only system

Ask one question first: does a disbursement reach the bill without anyone retyping it? If the answer is no, the recovery ratio is almost certainly far lower than assumed, regardless of how good the reports look. Then check whether all four output channels are covered, whether the ratio is measured at all, and whether anyone can state it from memory. Firms with strong recovery always can.

Related South African case studies

A similar replacement of a reporting-only product is covered in our Sandton law firm disbursement recovery case study, and a three-office comparison appears in the Gauteng multi-branch case study. For the platform behind these results, see nQ ZebraWorks and our comparison with PaperCut.

nQ ZebraWorks is developed by Zebraworks, whose invoices-to-cash platform underpins the disbursement capture described above. Khwezi Holdings implements and supports it for law firms across South Africa and the region.

This website uses cookies to improve your web experience.
Home
Search